I am dead. My name doesn’t matter anymore. It’s carved on some weathered stone, maybe a memorial wall, maybe forgotten entirely. I was a soldier, one of countless who bled out in the mud, the sand, the jungle, or some godforsaken trench for causes we were told were noble. Freedom. Liberty. The defense of our way of life. Lies, all of it. I speak from the grave to shake you awake, to scream what the living are too afraid to whisper: the wars we fought, the lives we lost, the pain we endured – it was all a waste. A cruel, calculated waste orchestrated by those who never held a rifle, never buried a friend, never woke screaming from the nightmares that don’t end.

You honor us on your holidays, with flags and parades, with tears and speeches about sacrifice. You call us heroes. But I’m no hero. I was a pawn, a body thrown into the meat grinder of war to serve the ambitions of men who see human life as a tradable commodity. They sit in their boardrooms, their war rooms, their ivory towers, reshaping the world to their liking while we – the poor, the desperate, the idealistic – pay the price. They don’t care about us. They never did. To them, my death was just a number, a statistic to justify the next budget, the next contract, the next conquest.

Do you know what it’s like to lose? Not a battle, not a war, but everything? I watched my brothers die, their eyes wide with shock as life drained away. I carried their letters home, stained with blood, to widows and orphans who’d never be whole again. I saw men return broken – not just in body, but in soul – haunted by what they’d seen, what they’d done, what they could never unsee. Families shattered, futures stolen, all for what? For promises of freedom that were never kept. For a world where you still beg for permission to travel, to build a home, to live without the state’s boot on your neck. You’re not free. You never were. Those parades? They’re a mockery, a distraction from the chains you don’t even see.

They told us we were fighting for liberty, for justice, for the right to live as we choose. They fed us stories of enemies who hated our way of life, who’d destroy us if we didn’t strike first. We believed them. I believed them. Young, naive, full of fire, I thought I was defending something sacred. But it was all a lie, a script written by those who profit from death. The war industry grew fat while we starved, bled, and died. The politicians, the bankers, the legacy families – they sent us to kill and be killed, and they reaped the rewards. New borders, new markets, new ways to control you. And us? We were just tools, disposable, replaceable, forgotten.

The true enemy wasn’t the man in the other trench, the one I was trained to hate. He was like me – scared, tired, fighting for a lie he thought was truth. The real enemy was the one who sent us there. The ones who shook hands over our graves, who signed deals while our blood soaked the earth. The ones who taxed you to death to fund their wars, who stripped your rights and called them privileges, who turned your labor into their wealth while you struggled to survive. They’re the ones who betrayed us, who betrayed you. And they’re still doing it.

Look around. You’re not free. You’re taxed into submission, watched, controlled, told what you can say, where you can go, how you can live. Your rights are illusions, revocable the moment they inconvenience the state or its puppet-masters. The wars we fought didn’t change that. They never will. They’re not meant to. They’re meant to enrich the few while the many suffer, to keep you divided, distracted, and obedient. The poor fight, the rich profit, and the cycle never ends.

I’m not asking for your pity. I’m asking for your anger. Stop pretending our deaths meant something noble. Stop letting them use our sacrifices to justify their greed. My life, my brothers’ lives, the countless others – they were wasted. Not for freedom, not for you, but for power. For control. For a world where the average man gets shafted, always. Honor us by seeing the truth: the wars we died in were not our wars. They were theirs.

From the grave, I beg you – wake up. Stop believing their lies. Stop fighting their battles. The enemy isn’t across the sea or behind a rifle. The enemy is the one who sent me to die, who’ll send your sons and daughters next. They don’t care about us. They never will. And until you see that, my death, and all the others, will remain what they always were: a waste.

The article from Newsroom lays bare a festering wound in New Zealand’s so-called “system of justice” – a system that’s proven, yet again, to be a sham. The Royal Commission of Inquiry into Abuse in Care, the largest of its kind, exposed a grotesque regime of denial, minimization, and cover-up orchestrated by the state to shield its own rotten core. And what’s the outcome? Nothing. Not a single public servant implicated in this decades-long scandal will face so much as a slap on the wrist. This is not justice; it’s a middle finger to every survivor who dared to speak out, and to every citizen who naively believed the state might hold itself accountable.

I’ve been screaming this from the rooftops since day one: these inquiries are nothing but feel-good, taxpayer-funded theater. They’re meticulously crafted to give the illusion of action while ensuring the powerful walk free. The Abuse in Care inquiry is just the latest in a long line of window-dressing exercises – glossy reports, tearful apologies, and zero consequences. Look at the historical record: the Royal Commission on the Pike River Mine disaster produced 16 recommendations, yet no one was prosecuted for the 29 deaths. The inquiry into the Christchurch mosque attacks churned out pages of “findings,” but the systemic failures of intelligence and policing were quietly swept under the rug, not to mention state involvement. And don’t get me started on the endless probes into mental health services or child poverty – each one a parade of platitudes that changed nothing for the vulnerable. These inquiries are a financial racket, funneling millions into the pockets of retired judges, lawyers, counselors, and consultants who feast on the public purse while delivering carefully worded reports designed to protect the establishment.

And mark my words, the Covid inquiries – both of them – will follow the exact same script. Expect more hand-wringing, more “lessons learned,” and absolutely no accountability for the bureaucrats and politicians who bungled the response, eroded freedoms, and tanked the economy. These inquiries aren’t about truth; they’re about laundering the state’s sins and paying lip service to the public’s outrage. The same insiders who profited from the crisis will profit from the “investigation,” while the people get screwed – again.

This isn’t incompetence; it’s a feature, not a bug. The state protects its own, always has, always will. The Newsroom article quotes a lawyer who’s fought for survivors for 30 years, unsurprised that the state is shielding its implicated servants. Why? Because this is how the game is played. Senior public servants like the Solicitor-General and Education Secretary, named in the cover-up, still sit comfortably in their cushy offices, untouched by the inquiry’s findings. The message is clear: the powerful are untouchable, and the victims – those abused, tortured, and silenced – are just collateral damage in the state’s quest to preserve its own reputation.

Enough is enough. If you’re waiting for justice from this broken system, you’re delusional. The only way to see real accountability is to tear it all down. We need a completely new government, one free from the current crop of self-serving parliamentarians who’ve grown fat on our trust. The entire political and state apparatus – rotten to its core – needs a total overhaul. No more inquiries, no more reports, no more excuses. The people deserve a system that punishes the guilty, not one that hands them a free pass while survivors are left to pick up the pieces. Until we demand this, we’re just shouting into the void, and the state will keep laughing all the way to the bank.

Real political leadership with the guts to do the job – nzloyal.com

We worship those who defy tyranny, who stake their lives on the altar of our freedom. We call them heroes, modern gladiators, and the final sparks of resistance. But our admiration is a lie, a fleeting cheer from a crowd too spineless to stand with them. Like Romans gawking at a coliseum slaughter, we thrill at their bravery – until they’re struck down. Then we turn away, unmoved, chasing the next distraction.

These warriors fight a rigged game, battling a system that despises them. They stand for us, for our children, for a world unshackled from oppression. Yet when they’re silenced, imprisoned, or killed, we offer nothing – no rage, no justice, no fight to honour their sacrifice.

Worse, the same crowd that once cheered them turns vicious, tearing into these fallen fighters like a pack of rabid dogs. Frustrated by their failure, we lash out as if their defeat exposes our own impotence, our inability to challenge the leviathan that looms over us. We shrug, indifferent, ready to applaud the next doomed soul.

Betrayal by Silence

This isn’t support; it’s treachery. By abandoning those who bleed for us – and then scorning them for falling – we mock their courage and fuel the machine that destroys them – a state propped up by bankers and their overlords who feast on our inaction. Every moment we stay silent, we forge the chains that will bind us tighter.

The war is clear: the people against a corrupt, ravenous state. Our gladiators aren’t myths; they’re real, daring to resist where we falter. But we, the so-called “free,” sit on the sidelines, content to watch them fall, treating their sacrifice as mere spectacle.

The Price of Inaction

There’s no more room for hollow praise. If we don’t act, we’re architects of our own ruin. Our silence – and our betrayal of those who fight – hands victory to the forces that seek to control us. Without action – without risk, without defiance – we’ll wake one day to a world stripped bare, our freedoms gone, our children’s future stolen. We’ll stare in the mirror, stunned, wondering how it all slipped away.

This is the lesson: stay silent, and you lose everything. Our gladiators fight for us, but they can’t win alone. If we don’t join the battle, we’ll stand in the ashes of our inaction, with no one left to blame, but ourselves.

Join the fight: nzloyal.com

Image credit: pbs.org

Kiwis, wake up. The world is a rigged casino, and you’re not the house. The same entities peddling “deliverance” from evil are the ones pulling the strings – globalists, politicians, and their corporate mates. They dangle hope like a carrot, keeping you hooked on promises of truth while you abandon your own logic. Don’t fall for it. This is the shell game, and the pea’s never under the cup. Look at history.

The official stories of 9/11, the UK’s 7/7 bombings, Israel’s October 7th, Tasmania’s Port Arthur massacre, and our own Christchurch mosque attacks? They crumble under scrutiny. Yet inquiries and investigations are scripted before they start. Why? Because the outcomes were decided long ago.

These aren’t random tragedies – they’re moves on a chessboard, planned to control you. The psychopathic elite don’t care about your pain. They bank on it.

You’ve been conditioned to obey since birth. From the moment you’re born, you’re legally a slave – registered, numbered, and owned without your consent. No one told you.

Schools drill compliance into kids, teaching them to follow orders, not question them. Today’s children are targeted harder than ever – indoctrinated through screens, curricula, and fear. Control the kids, and you control the future. Rewrite history, erase inconvenient truths, and you’ve got a world of unquestioning minions ready to defend their chains.

The system thrives on confusion, distrust, and division. It pits mate against mate, ensuring you’re too busy fighting each other to notice the real enemy.

Those who dare stand up – whistleblowers, truth-tellers – are crushed as warnings. Step out of line, and you’re next.

But here’s the kicker: authority isn’t real. It’s a lie. Someone claims power over you, and most nod along, indoctrinated to comply.

Politicians, the enablers of this scam, pass laws to tighten the globalists’ grip. They control every lever – courts, media, police – ensuring your subjugation. Politics isn’t the answer, but it’s the battlefield. Ignoring it, hands victory to the enslavers.

You’re not helpless. There are at least three ways to fight back:

1. The Ballot Box: Overwhelm the rigged system. Vote for those who reject the globalist agenda, but don’t just vote – organize, demand transparency, and hold politicians’ feet to the fire. Apathy is surrender.
2. The Ammo Box: If push comes to shove, you may have to fight for your right to exist as a free man or woman. History shows freedom isn’t given – it’s taken. Be ready.
3. The Land Grab: Pool resources, aquire a large chunk of land, and declare your own nation-state, for example, under the 1933 Montevideo Convention. It’s legal, bold, and a middle finger to the system.

This isn’t about hippie vibes or manifesting nonsense. It’s about seeing the world for what it is and acting. You’re not just a cog in their machine – you’re a New Zealander with a backbone. All of you have a stake in this. The system wants you docile, distracted, or dead. Prove them wrong.

Our voice refuses to bow. The truth will keep flowing, no matter how hard they try to silence it.

Join the fight. Question everything. Act now. Your future, your kids’ future, depends on it.

The controversy surrounding New Zealand Green MP Benjamin Doyle has sparked a heated debate about child safety, parental rights, and the role of activism in shaping societal norms. Doyle, who has faced backlash for his private social media posts, has been accused of promoting harmful and inappropriate content, particularly regarding his child.

Key Concerns:

• Child Safety: Doyle’s posts have raised concerns about his child’s well-being and potential risks associated with his parenting decisions.
• Parental Rights vs. Children’s Rights: The debate highlights the tension between parents’ rights to make decisions for their children and the need to protect children from potential harm.
• Activism and Mainstream Acceptance: Critics argue that the push for mainstream acceptance of trans activism may be compromising child safety and ignoring potential long-term consequences.

The Controversy Unfolds

Doyle’s private Instagram account, “BibleBeltBussy,” featured posts that included a photo of him with a child captioned “bussy galore.” The term “bussy” has been interpreted as a slang word combining “boy” and a vulgar anatomical reference. Deputy Prime Minister Winston Peters and Prime Minister Christopher Luxon have questioned the appropriateness of Doyle’s posts, with Luxon stating that they were “really inappropriate”.

Reactions from the Green Party

Green Party co-leaders Chlöe Swarbrick and Marama Davidson have defended Doyle, arguing that his posts were taken out of context and that the controversy stems from misinterpretation of language used within the queer community. However, some critics argue that the party’s response has been inadequate and that they are prioritizing protecting Doyle over addressing concerns about child safety.

Balancing Personal Choice and Child Safety

The debate raises complex questions about balancing individual freedoms with the need to protect children. While adults should be free to make their own choices, children’s safety and well-being must be prioritized. The conversation must consider the potential long-term consequences of parenting decisions and the role of activism in shaping societal norms.

Ultimately, the focus should be on ensuring that children are provided with a safe environment, free from life-changing decisions made by parents or activists. By prioritizing child safety and promoting nuanced discussions, a more balanced and compassionate society may result.

The personal choices and identities of consenting adults are their own business, and individuals should be free to identify as they see fit – whether that’s as a man, woman, bi, trans, non-binary, or even something entirely unconventional – like a toaster.

However, when it comes to children, a different standard applies. Kids should be allowed to grow and develop without being influenced by adult ideologies or agendas, and they should be given the autonomy to make their own decisions when they reach adulthood. It’s essential to prioritize children’s well-being and agency, ensuring they’re not pressured or coerced into making life-altering choices before they’re capable of informed consent. By doing so, we create a society that values individual freedom while also protecting the vulnerable.

The notion that viruses are the primary cause of many diseases has been a cornerstone of modern medicine for over a century. However, a growing body of research suggests that this paradigm may be fundamentally flawed. Dr. Mark Bailey’s seminal paper, “A Farewell to Virology,” (2022) and the work of Dr. Sam Bailey, Dr. Andrew Kaufman, and Dr. Tom Cowan, have collectively challenged the conventional wisdom on viruses and vaccines.

Their research posits that viruses do not exist as disease-causing entities, but rather as misidentified cellular components and other biological phenomena. This idea is not new and builds on the pioneering work of former virologist Dr. Stefan Lanka and The Perth Group. However, it has gained significant traction in recent years, largely because of the COVID-19 scamdemic. The implications of this theory are profound, and they raise a crucial question: if viruses do not exist as claimed, what are we vaccinating against?

The vaccine schedules that govern our lives are based on the assumption that viruses are real and pose a significant threat to public health. However, if this assumption is incorrect, then the justification for vaccines crumbles. Are we simply creating a future dependent clientele for pharmaceutical companies?

Proponents of the conventional virology paradigm often dismiss these ideas as “pseudoscience” or “conspiracy theories.” However, a closer examination of the evidence reveals that the criticisms leveled against the Baileys, Kaufman, and Cowan are largely unfounded. These doctors have pointed out that an experiment should adhere to the scientific method and show the “virus” as an independent variable. As it stands, the virology literature has fallen short on this basic requirement.

One common criticism is that these researchers are not “experts” in the field of virology. However, this argument is easily countered by pointing out that the very notion of virology is being challenged. Who better to challenge the status quo than those who have dedicated themselves to understanding the underlying biology? Furthermore, Dr. Lanka was a virologist in the 1990s but abandoned the profession when he realised the methods were pseudoscientific.

Another criticism is that the idea that viruses don’t exist is “unproven.” However, this argument ignores the fact that the burden of proof lies with those who claim that viruses do exist. The onus is on the scientific community to provide empirical evidence for the existence of viruses, rather than relying on assumptions and establishment dogma.

The fact that no credible expert has challenged or refuted the findings of the Baileys, Kaufman, and Cowan speaks volumes. It suggests that the conventional virology paradigm is built on shaky ground and that the idea that viruses do not exist is not only plausible but also worthy of serious consideration.

So, what are we vaccinating against? Is it a real, tangible threat, or is it a phantom menace created to justify a lucrative industry? The answer to this question has far-reaching implications for public health, the pharmaceutical industry, and our understanding of the human body. Ask yourself: “who benefits the most from upholding the virus model?”

We invite you to explore this topic further, to question the assumptions that underlie our vaccine schedules, and to seek out the evidence for yourself. The truth is out there, waiting to be uncovered.

More Info:

https://drsambailey.com/a-farewell-to-virology-expert-edition/

https://nzloyal.com/health/

The time for complacency is over. The Covid-19 vaccine debacle has exposed the callous disregard for human life by those in power. Not a single individual has been held accountable for the harm inflicted. The courts have colluded with the government, and the police have aided and abetted crimes against humanity.

The Royal Commission of Inquiry’s revelations about decades-long child abuse in state and faith-based care have yielded nothing but empty promises. The inquiries themselves are a sham – money-laundering rackets for retired judges, lawyers, consultants, and other parasites. The victims remain ignored, forgotten, and marginalized.

This is not a matter of incompetence; it’s a deliberate, systematic assault on our rights and freedoms. The system is designed to maintain the status quo, to keep the powerful in power, and to silence dissent.

We are at a crossroads. We can continue to succumb to the distractions, the race-baiting, and the divisiveness fabricated by the system. Or we can stand up, united, and demand justice.

The enemy is not the person next to you; it’s the system that exploits and oppresses us all. It’s the politicians who lie, the bureaucrats who cover up, and the corporate elites who profit from our suffering.

In 2026, we have a choice. We can continue to participate in this charade, or we can rise up and demand a new era of accountability. We can elect leaders who will genuinely represent us, or we can perpetuate the cycle of oppression.

The time for excuses is over. The time for action is now. We will either stand together and fight for our freedom, or we will surely fall, one by one, to the forces of oppression.

The choice is clear. The choice is yours.

For more information see: Justice Policy and Health Policy.

In the wake of the New Zealand government’s zealous enforcement of the Anti-Money Laundering (AML) legislation, banks have been on a crusade to cancel accounts and freeze assets of individuals and organizations they deem “high-risk.” But beneath the veneer of righteousness lies a sinister reality. Banks are not the paragons of virtue they claim to be. In fact, they are the very embodiment of the predatory and exploitative practices they purport to combat.

The AML legislation, touted as a necessary measure to combat terrorism and organized crime, has become a convenient pretext for banks to indulge in a frenzy of account closures and asset seizures. But what about the banks’ own complicity in money laundering and other illicit activities? The hypocrisy is staggering.

Banks have long been accused of facilitating money laundering, tax evasion, and other financial crimes. In 2016, the Panama Papers scandal revealed widespread money laundering and tax evasion involving some of the world’s largest banks. More recently, the FinCEN Files scandal exposed how banks had knowingly facilitated transactions with suspected criminals and terrorists.

But the banks’ culpability goes far beyond mere complicity. They are, in fact, the architects of a system designed to enslave individuals and nations in a cycle of debt. The practice of usury, which involves lending money at exorbitant interest rates, has been condemned throughout history as a morally reprehensible practice. Yet, it remains a cornerstone of the banking system.

The consequences of this system are devastating. Individuals are saddled with debt, forced to work multiple jobs just to make ends meet. Nations are coerced into adopting austerity measures, slashing social programs, and privatizing essential services. The resulting inequality, poverty, and social unrest are all symptoms of a system designed to benefit the few at the expense of the many.

And here lies the laughable irony: the New Zealand government, ultimately controlled by the very same money masters, has given the banks the power to wreak this economic havoc. The same government that claims to be protecting its citizens from financial crimes has, in fact, enabled the banks to commit these crimes with impunity.

But what’s even more galling is the banks’ audacity in demanding to know what we plan to do with our own money. When making a withdrawal, banks often ask intrusive questions about the purpose of the transaction. Meanwhile, they themselves should be the ones being interrogated. What about their own shady dealings? What about their role in perpetuating economic inequality and social injustice?

Furthermore, the banks are furthering their grip on control by phasing out cash and pushing for a completely digital economy. This would ensure that every single transaction is monitored and controlled, giving them unprecedented power over our financial lives. The abolition of cash would also eliminate any remaining anonymity in our financial transactions, making it easier for banks to track and manipulate our behavior.

The banks’ stranglehold on the global economy has also been a major contributor to wars and conflicts throughout history. The ability to create money out of thin air, combined with the power to manipulate interest rates and control the flow of credit, gives banks an unparalleled level of influence over governments and economies.

So, when banks lecture us about the importance of complying with AML regulations, we should not be fooled. They are not motivated by a desire to combat crime or protect the integrity of the financial system. They are motivated by a desire to maintain their grip on power, to continue exploiting individuals and nations for their own profit.

The canceling of accounts and freezing of assets is merely a symptom of a larger disease. It is a manifestation of the banks’ insatiable hunger for power and control. Unless we recognize the true nature of this beast, unless we confront the predatory practices of the banking cartel, we will never be able to solve the majority of society’s problems.

The battle against the banks is a battle for our very freedom. It is a battle against a system designed to enslave us to reduce us to debt-slaves. It is a battle for the future of our planet, for the ability to create a world that is just, equitable, and free.

So, let us not be fooled by the banks’ hypocrisy. Let us not be intimidated by their power. Let us rise up, reclaim control of our lives, and let us create a world where the banks no longer hold us hostage.

The time for action is now. The future of humanity depends on it.

For more information see: Taxation & Monetary Policy

As I examine the New Zealand government’s consideration of extending the parliamentary term from three to four years, I am compelled to speak out against this move. The 1986 Constitution Act, which established the current parliamentary system, was passed without proper consultation or input from the people, effectively disenfranchising them from the decision-making process.

I firmly believe that this move was a clear overstepping of convention, as the government failed to follow the established precedent of holding a referendum to alter the constitution. Instead, they relied on the obscure and rarely used Section 268 of the Imperial Laws Application Act 1988, which allowed for the amendment of the Constitution Act without a referendum.

In my research, I have found that the 1986 Constitution Act is, in fact, illegal. The Act was enacted by a process that was not authorized by any prior enactment, and therefore, the whole of the Act is invalid. This renders the government’s consideration of extending the parliamentary term as a further attempt to consolidate power and undermine the democratic process.

Furthermore, I believe that the Governor-General’s role in signing the Act into law was merely ceremonial, serving only as a rubber stamp for parliamentary decisions, rather than providing any meaningful checks and balances on power. This undermines the principles of representative democracy and reinforces the illegitimate nature of the government.

In light of this evidence, I firmly believe that the New Zealand government has been operating without legitimacy since the enactment of the 1986 Constitution Act. Their consideration of extending the parliamentary term is a further attempt to consolidate power and undermine the democratic process. I urge the government to address the underlying issues of illegitimacy and work towards establishing a more genuine and representative democracy, along the lines of a constitutional republic.

For more info see our Justice Policy

The trans-train has been chugging along, leaving a trail of confusion, harm, and devastation in its wake. It’s time to pull this train into the station and offload its toxic ideology once and for all.

Exposure to gender ideology has severe consequences, particularly for children. It can lead to depression, anxiety, suicidal ideation, and a host of other mental health issues. Children who are encouraged to question their biological sex and explore alternative gender identities are more likely to experience gender dysphoria, social isolation, and emotional distress.

The normalization of gender ideology in our schools and institutions is creating a culture of confusion and misinformation. Children are being taught that their biological sex is not fixed, but rather a fluid concept that can be changed at will. This is not only scientifically inaccurate, but also damaging to a child’s sense of identity and self-worth.

It’s essential to note that this isn’t about restricting the rights of consenting adults. No one cares what two or more adults wish to do in their private lives, as long as it doesn’t harm others. However, this freedom should not come at the expense of children’s well-being and development.

Children lack the discernment and maturity to comprehend complex gender ideologies, and exposing them to these concepts can be detrimental to their emotional and psychological health. It’s our responsibility as a society to protect children from harm and ensure they grow up in a safe and nurturing environment.

Moreover, organizations that seek to indoctrinate children with this toxic ideology must be held accountable. Severe punishment, including loss of funding and legal repercussions, must be imposed on any organization that attempts to promote gender ideology to children.

It’s time to take a stand against the trans-train and its toxic ideology. We must protect our children from the harm caused by gender ideology and ensure they grow up in a safe and nurturing environment, free from the destructive influences of this ideology.

The trans-train must be stopped, and its toxic cargo offloaded once and for all. Our children’s futures depend on it.

Education Policy

Health Policy

Image: Chicago Transport Authority