The New Zealand state can literally get away with murder – and they’re proving it right now.
On March 15, 2019, the Christchurch Mosque attacks shook the nation. Fifty-one people died. The world watched in horror as the ‘livestream’ captured the ‘terrorist act’. Or did it?
A detailed forensic video analysis – conducted outside New Zealand because the evidence itself is banned here – has concluded with absolute certainty: the official video is fake. Staged. Zero real victims visible. Anomalies in recoil, ballistics, blood, injuries, digital manipulation, and replica-style weapons that scream Hollywood production, not raw reality. This isn’t speculation. It’s forensic examination by experts who examined the footage frame by frame.
And what did our government do? They didn’t investigate. They didn’t debate. They banned it. Under the Films, Videos, and Publications Classification Act, possessing, viewing, or sharing the video became a criminal offence – punishable by up to 14 years in prison. They classified it “objectionable” faster than you can say “damage control.” The manifesto too. Evidence suppressed by decree.
This is the same system that can deem something as benign as a Winnie the Pooh reference or image “objectionable” if it suits their filters. Think about that: cartoon bears can be criminalised, but questioning the state’s narrative on the worst terrorist attack in our history? That’s dangerous thoughtcrime. The people are not allowed to see, judge, or impart the raw evidence for themselves. Free speech, public scrutiny, and the right to evidence? Mocked and crushed.
This is not about protecting the public. This is the system protecting itself. Self-preservation at all costs. Legislation rushed through to censor anything that challenges the official story. Complicity in whatever truly transpired that day is being shielded by the full force of the state apparatus – police, politicians, censors, and compliant media.
Every politician has seen the forensic report. Every major media outlet, including the so-called “alternative” ones. The Police Commissioner. They all received it. With the exception of The Daily Telegraph NZ – Not one has uttered a word. Silence. Complicity by omission. Who exactly are they working for? The public they claim to serve, or the machine that keeps them in power and protected?
The same pattern repeats with the COVID jab rollout. Questions about excess deaths, adverse events, and the aggressive mandates were met with heavy-handed censorship, dismissal of data, and attacks on anyone raising concerns. Official narratives were protected at all costs, while dissenting voices – including those with legitimate data – were silenced or punished. Just like Christchurch, inconvenient truths about the jab were buried to shield the elites who pushed the rollout.
We see this theatre time and again. Take the Royal Commission of Inquiry into Abuse in State Care. We all know the horrific truth: systemic abuse of the most vulnerable over decades. The evidence was overwhelming. Yet the response from the government and state apparatus has been classic lip-service – public apologies, vague promises of “redress,” and carefully worded reports that ultimately protect the guilty parties within the system. Real accountability? Almost none. The club of criminal elites looks after its own.
As a journalist holding power to account, I’ve been targeted for simply demanding transparency on these issues. Lawyers? Their hands are tied within the very framework the state designed to maintain the illusion of justice. They operate inside the system; rocking the boat too hard risks their place in it. If you’re connected to the state apparatus, crime pays very well. For the rest of us? Dissent is rebranded as extremism.
The Christchurch cover-up exposes the rot: No organised resistance succeeds because the rules are rigged. They write the laws, control the narrative, classify the evidence, and punish those who dare look behind the curtain. They used the tragedy to push gun control, online censorship, and “hate speech” expansions while burying inconvenient truths.
New Zealanders, wake up. This isn’t governance – it’s a protection racket. The emperor has no clothes, and the video they banned proves the official story is a fabrication. Demand the forensic report be addressed publicly. Demand answers, not bans. Demand the right to see evidence and decide for yourself.
If they can fake or censor Christchurch, bury the real story on the jab rollout, and turn a Royal Commission into another whitewash, what else are they hiding? The system isn’t broken. It is working exactly as designed – for them, not you.
Share this before they try to memory-hole it too. The truth doesn’t fear investigation. Only liars do.
